Quick sports cars
Sports cars under 5 seconds 0-60
A sub-5-second 0-60 time is quick enough for most real-world driving. This page filters the database to sports cars under that mark.
What this comparison shows
Use this shortlist to scan sports cars under 5 seconds 0-60 across sports car with gas, plug-in hybrid, hybrid, ev. It is most useful as a starting point before opening the full comparison table.
This page is intentionally narrow: it compares the current 0-60 mph rows in the 0-60 Battle database, keeps the source type visible, and links each row back to the original source. It is a fast screening page, not a replacement for a full road test or manufacturer specification sheet.
| # | Vehicle | 0-60 | Body | Power | Drive | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chevrolet Corvette ZR12025 RWD | 2.2 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 2 | Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance2025 PHEV coupe | 2.4 sec | Sports car | Plug-in hybrid | AWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 3 | Chevrolet Corvette E-Ray2025 AWD hybrid | 2.5 sec | Sports car | Hybrid | AWD | Manufacturer claim - Chevrolet |
| 4 | Porsche 911 Carrera GTS2025 Hybrid coupe | 2.5 sec | Sports car | Hybrid | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 5 | Chevrolet Corvette Stingray2025 Z51 | 2.8 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 6 | Ford Mustang GTD2025 Performance package | 2.8 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 7 | Porsche 911 Carrera2025 Base coupe | 3.1 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 8 | Dodge Charger Daytona2025 Scat Pack EV | 3.3 sec | Sports car | EV | AWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 9 | Toyota GR Supra2025 3.0 automatic | 3.7 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 10 | Nissan Z NISMO2025 Automatic | 3.9 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 11 | Ford Mustang GT2025 Performance exhaust | 4.2 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
| 12 | Nissan Z Performance2025 Automatic | 4.3 sec | Sports car | Gas | RWD | Tested - Car and Driver |
Quick take
Below 5 seconds, tire choice, launch technique, gearing, and road surface can move the number more than shoppers expect.
Source notes
Rows on this page include 11 tested entries, 1 manufacturer claim. Tested numbers usually carry the most context, but even a tested result can shift with tires, weather, road surface, battery state, fuel level, and launch procedure.
If two vehicles are within a few tenths of a second, treat them as close for everyday use unless the same publication tested both under similar conditions. A small 0-60 gap can be less important than braking, range, cargo space, tire cost, towing, fuel economy, or how easy the quick trim is to buy.
How to read these numbers
0-60 mph times can change with tire, temperature, state of charge, launch-control mode, surface, altitude, and whether rollout is included. This page is meant for quick comparison, with source links included so you can verify the exact trim and test method.
- Use the Source column to separate instrumented tests from manufacturer claims.
- Use the Body and Power columns to avoid comparing vehicles with totally different jobs.
- Open the full table if you need filters for make, origin, model year, or maximum 0-60 time.
0-60 ranking FAQ
Why can 0-60 times vary by source?
0-60 mph results can vary by trim, tire, battery state, weather, road surface, launch-control setup, and whether the test includes rollout.
Should I use 0-60 mph as the only buying metric?
No. It is useful for quick acceleration comparison, but shoppers should also compare braking, handling, range, fuel economy, cargo space, reliability, and price.